The case of Abraham Cherrix should send a deep chill through the heart of every parent.
After three months of ineffective treatments in 2005 for Hodgkin's lymphoma had suffered, Abraham rejected his doctor's recommendation by a second round of chemotherapy to go. He chose instead, in which one natural, non-toxic methods with alternative medicine.
According to his research, he traveled with his father to Bio-Medical Center in Tijuana, Mexico. Betreatments included liquid herbal supplements and sugar-free, organic diet consisting mainly of fresh fruits and vegetables. When she came home, she said Abraham oncologist, Dr. Rebecca Byrd, keep them involved in his care. Want no part of their decisions, they immediately declared their irrational decision, it referred to "medical neglect" and called the Accomack County Department of Social Services.
Within days, the town Social Services had staffwas partially awarded custody of Abraham, and at 5:20 Clock on Friday 21 July 2006 Judge Jesse E. Demps ruled that Abraham's parents were negligent. They were forced to sign their child in the hospital on the following Tuesday morning, and the authorization for medical treatment that they hold - like physicians - necessary to deliver. When they refused to do so, they could lose custody full custody of their children, and very likely to put their four other children in dangeras well.
This case caught the attention of the national media, because at the heart of every parent should ask the following questions: "Who really in control of my child?" "When a child is mature enough to participate in their own health decisions," "How are we to the point where doctors, judges and social workers have more rights than the parents' decisions about the health of my child?"
To an adult
In most cases,Years if a person acquires all the rights and obligations of being an adult is 18 years old. However, there are cases in which a child can be considered associated with a legal adult before the age of majority. How can Arizona, Florida, Massachusetts, New York and Utah, married at age 16 with parental consent. You can marry legally in Georgia, Mississippi, Michigan and North Carolina with the consent of the parents, if you are 15 years old. Texas allows for a 14 years oldget married with parental consent and New Hampshire is even possible to marry women 13 years old with parental consent and court permission. (1)
In six states (Connecticut, Hawaii, New York, Oregon, Vermont and Washington) and Washington DC, a 16-year-old has the right to an abortion without consent or notification of parents. Thirty-four other states have mechanisms in place to circumvent parental consent or notice requirement. (2)
A 16-year-old can hold a full-time job,Travel outside the country, drive a car and have full responsibility for the children, while someone was babysitting. A 16-year-old can be sentenced for murder as an adult.
But if you're 16, you have no right to say what kind of treatment is to force you out of the medical system, even if your parents support your right to refuse, too. Cherrix told the press: "This is my body that I should worry about. I should have the right to tell anyone what I want to have to do with this body.I have studied. I did the research. I came to this conclusion that the chemotherapy was not the way I wanted to take. "(3) His maturity is no weight in the court and gave no authority charged with the medical judge, his physician.
Parental Rights and the Foundation for medical neglect
When it comes to decisions about their children, parents really have few rights. This term comes from the ancient world and was first continued by Plato put on a state provided publicEducation. He lobbied for the elimination of child care for their parents and raised them as a ward of the state. It is interesting that in 1918, on the formation of the Congress of the Communist Party of the workers was claimed in Russia: "We must remove the children from the crude influence of their families." (4)
The mechanism for the enforcement of "educational neglect" (5)-such as truancy and in some cases, homeschooling (6) - is part of teachers and social workers. In medical decisions,Doctors are forced to medical "standard of care" treatments of the children of parents willing to be charged. Doctors have not only the right to step, they are mandated by state law to report abuse and neglect of medical services for children. The decision is usually made when a physician's action or inaction of a parent's view, places the child in danger of death or disability. A common occurrence is when a parent is a Jehovah's Witness who refuses a blood transfusion for theirChild for religious reasons.
Broad support and extensive court gives priority to the assistance of a physician's decision to call Children's Services. The reason for this authority is clearly stated in a paper that in 1996 states: "Whether (the parents) truly healthy, and in any other capacity model parents, insisting on treatment that is scientifically inferior to conventionally accepted method of treatment is unfair even if their intention is not. "(7)
Since the state is committedwith the premise that knows the "best doctor," are the parents as "unfit" if they refuse, a proposed conventional medical treatment. Social workers have the power to the child once told by a doctor that they pull a recalcitrant patient on the hands. Police have been known to enforce the decision by force of arms.
The current system was established to protect abused and neglected children too obvious. It would provide adequate protection if medical professionals wereaccessible to common sense. In the case of Abraham Cherrix, respects his parents and liked her conventional oncologist enough to inform them about their decision, they want to belong to an ongoing treatment of Abraham. The result reflects the current mess our medical system is in. Unfortunately, common sense is not very common these days and at odds with your doctor can lead to removal of the child from home.
Modern medicine operates under the pretext that "sciencerests. "It argues that their therapies were developed by the research gold standard: the double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study. However, most medical therapies has never been subjected to this type of analysis. Evidence - based medicine since the first since 1990 in progress. The list of standard medical therapies that have to be worthless, having been examined is long. Tens of thousands of people through the use of "usual and sufferedusual therapies before they become useless. (8) The implication that the alternative practices Cherrix searched the family "are unproven and dangerous" may very well be said about the conventional treatments it is forced by his oncologist.
The Cherrix case is one of a series of recent medical travesties where judges, doctors and the State have forced medical treatment of children against the concerns of parents. In January 2005, 13-year-old KatieWernecke was diagnosed with Hodgkin's lymphoma. When Katie's parents, Michelle and Edward Wernecke, radiation declined to intervene for her daughter, Texas Children Services. Katie was in foster care for four months and her mother was placed under arrest on charges of interference with custody of children. (9)
In the past year (July 2006), the parents were informed by a 9-month-old boy, Riley Rogers, the fact that the child needs emergency surgery for a kidney problem. The mother did not agree and smuggledher son from the hospital. A few days later he was found and sent to the hospital, the mother was charged with second-degree kidnapping and sent to prison. It turned out that the operation was not an "emergency" after all. (10)
Americans die at the other on the side of the world into a "fight for freedom." And yet, the freedom to choose vitamins, organic foods and herbs over toxic, potentially lethal treatment is considered a crime. The total number of deaths caused byConventional medicine is more than 780,000 per year, so that (the medical system the leading cause of death and injury in the U.S. 11) Whose freedoms should we fight?
These stories should enrage all parents. Who really "owns" your child? Who owns your body? Americans need to declare their freedom from the grip of conventional medicine and its authoritarian tactics. As clearly by U.S. House of Representatives, Ron Paul, a doctor, "When we told the government the powerto make medical decisions for us, which we accept, in essence, that the state owns our bodies. "Have we at this point?
Justice in the Aftermath
This terrible example of bureaucratic overreach gave birth to Abraham's Law, a law in Virginia law in February 2007 was signed by a 87-9 vote in the House. The law allows parents or legal caregivers to refuse medical treatment for a child when she and the child agree, if the child is at least 14 years old and asMature if they had other options considered, and if they think their decision in the best interest of the child. (12) Virginia legislature did a good thing, by this law, but it is outrageous that the law had to be worked out, the first place. With its passage, but the work has just begun. The next step is to ensure that this right is guaranteed by federal law in every state.
There are many politically active organizations are working diligently to preserveRights of American citizens. Such an organization, the American Association for Health Freedom (AAHF), played a role in the adoption of the law of Abraham. AAHF, the politically active voice for consumers at the federal level, fighting for a right of patients to choose the best therapy for his family to protect. Moreover AAHF will work on state law, the physician's ability, alternative medical treatment without fear of reprisals by government provide medical coverage to adoptboards. Please contact AAHF through the Health Freedom website to engage.
Recommend : Free play game health book linkdofollow.com hosting health hotels beauty makeup
